Inclusive Hiring Practices for Frontline Roles: What Works Across the Funnel

Article15 min readTeam Radius Hire

Orange hi-vis vests in every size hang on a row of hooks above safety shoes in every size; a new starter takes one from the middle

Short answer: Inclusive hiring practices for frontline roles are mostly process choices. Ask only for what the job needs, put pay and shift times in the advert, let people apply by phone without a CV, ask everyone the same questions, make adjustments when asked, run the same checks for every hire and record the reason for each decision.

Key takeaways

  • Much exclusion in frontline hiring happens through ordinary steps: a requirement nobody needs, a phone screen during the applicant's own shift.
  • A large Dutch field experiment found ethnic discrimination in hiring and no evidence that adding personal information to applications reduced it.
  • Structured interviews came out on top in a 2022 review of how well selection methods predict job performance, so consistency does not cost quality.
  • Dutch equal treatment law covers job offers, applicants and agency placement, and requires effective adjustments for disability or chronic illness where needed.
  • Technology can give every applicant the same structure at any hour, but it does not remove bias. A person should decide.

What are inclusive hiring practices in frontline recruitment?

They are the steps that give every capable applicant an equal chance, from how the job is defined to how the decision is made and explained.

Order pickers, drivers, cleaners, security officers and hospitality staff often apply on a phone, between shifts. Many have no CV. A large part of the pool may speak Dutch as a second language. Agencies and employers can handle hundreds of applicants a week for the same few roles.

Can a night shift worker reach you outside office hours? Is each requirement in the advert needed for the work? Do two recruiters at two branches ask the same questions? Inclusion is how the process is built. Who ends up hired is the outcome you then check.

Why does inclusion in frontline hiring come down to process?

Unfair outcomes usually come from small steps repeated hundreds of times.

Bias in Dutch hiring is documented. Researchers sent 4,211 fictitious applications to vacancies in ten occupations in the Netherlands and found discrimination against applicants from ethnic minority groups, with rates that differed considerably between groups. They found no evidence that adding personal information to the applications reduced it (Thijssen, Coenders and Lancee, 2021). Our blog No Hiring Tool Removes Bias. Including Ours. looks at this study in more detail.

Illustrative example: an agency receives 200 applications a week for warehouse roles. If one step loses one applicant in ten for a reason unrelated to the work, such as an interview slot during the applicant's own shift, that is 20 people a week, more than 1,000 a year, who never got a fair look. Nobody decided to exclude them. The process did.

One step that loses one applicant in ten

Illustrative agency with 200 applications a week for warehouse roles

20 people a week who never got a fair look

200applications a week

more than 1,000people a year. Nobody decided to exclude them.

Illustrative example. An interview slot during the applicant's own shift is one such step.

Structure also helps quality. In a 2022 review, structured interviews came out on top of the common selection methods for predicting job performance (Sackett, Zhang, Berry and Lievens, 2022). The research is mostly from outside the Netherlands and measures job performance, not fairness, but it shows that asking everyone the same questions does not lower the bar.

Wording matters before anyone applies. In five studies, job adverts with more masculine themed words, such as competitive or dominant, made women find the jobs less appealing, mainly because they expected not to belong (Gaucher, Friesen and Kay, 2011).

What does Dutch and EU law expect from employers and agencies?

Equal treatment law covers every step from advert to placement.

How these rules apply depends on the facts, so take advice on specific cases.

  • The General Equal Treatment Act (AWGB) prohibits direct and indirect distinction on grounds including religion, belief, race, sex, nationality, sexual orientation and civil status, when offering a job, when handling applicants for a vacancy and in placement by agencies (AWGB, articles 1 and 5). Indirect distinction, where a neutral rule affects one group harder, is allowed only for a legitimate aim with appropriate and necessary means (AWGB, article 2).
  • Separate acts cover disability or chronic illness and age with the same scope (WGBH/CZ; WGBL). The disability act requires effective adjustments where needed, unless they are a disproportionate burden.
  • Only an examining doctor may ask about a candidate's health or past sickness absence, and a medical examination is allowed only where the role sets special medical requirements (Wet op de medische keuringen, article 4).
  • The Netherlands Institute for Human Rights gives opinions on complaints that are not legally binding, though it reports that organisations take measures in more than 80% of cases where it finds discrimination (College voor de Rechten van de Mens). It also states that application procedures must be transparent, verifiable and systematic, including when algorithms are used (werving en selectie).
RuleWhat it says for hiringStatus on 22 October 2026
Pay Transparency Directive (EU) 2023/970, article 5Requires EU member states to give job applicants a right to information on starting pay or its range, for example in the advert or before the interview, and to ensure employers do not ask about pay history.A directive, which member states had to put into national law by 7 June 2026. The Dutch bill (36 949), submitted on 21 May 2026 (Rijksoverheid), has not been voted on, so these rules are not yet Dutch law.
AI Act, article 5(1)(f)Bans AI that infers emotions from biometric data, such as face or voice, in the workplace, except for medical or safety reasons. The Commission's guidelines, which are not binding, say this also covers candidates during recruitment.Applies since 2 February 2025.
GDPR, article 22The GDPR does not ban automated screening, but candidates have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing that significantly affects them, such as an automatic rejection, unless an exception applies (contract, law or explicit consent).Applies now.

Pay transparency and the emotion recognition ban, by date

  1. 2 February 2025AI Act, article 5(1)(f)The ban on AI that infers emotions from face or voice at work applies
  2. 21 May 2026Dutch bill 36 949Submitted to put the Pay Transparency Directive into Dutch law
  3. 7 June 2026Directive deadlineMember states had to put the Directive into national law
  4. 22 October 2026Position of this pageThe bill has not been voted on, so the pay rules are not yet Dutch law
Directive (EU) 2023/970; Rijksoverheid, 21 May 2026; Regulation (EU) 2024/1689

For the full timeline, see The EU AI Act and Recruitment.

What does an inclusive frontline hiring process look like, stage by stage?

Eight stages, each with one practice you can check this week.

StageHow people get excluded without anyone meaning toInclusive practiceWhat to record
1. RequirementsCopied from an old advert: fluent Dutch, five years of experience, own carOnly what the job needs, written as tasksEach requirement and its reason
2. AdvertNo pay, vague hours, jargonPay, shifts and start times, location, plain words, how to ask for an adjustmentThe advert text and date
3. ApplicationCV upload, long forms, desktop onlyA few minutes on a phone, no CV, any timeWhere and when each person applied
4. InterviewA call during the candidate's shift; different questions per recruiterThe same questions for everyone, at a time the candidate choosesEach answer against each requirement
5. AdjustmentsCandidates must explain a condition firstAsk everyone the same question; offer another formatThe adjustment asked for and given
6. ChecksExtra checks for some; checks at different momentsThe same checks for everyone you plan to hire, at the same stageWhat was checked, when, by whom
7. DecisionGut feeling; silence for those not chosenA named person decides against the requirements; everyone hears the outcomeThe reason, in terms of the requirements
8. ReviewNobody looks at the funnelMonthly look at where applicants drop outDrop out per stage

1. Write down only the requirements the job needs

Write each requirement as a supervisor would say it: "lifts boxes of up to 15 kilos through an eight hour shift" rather than "physically fit", and "can reach the site for a 06:00 start" rather than "own car". Then ask: if a new starter lacked this on day one, would the job fail, or would a week of training fix it? If training fixes it, it is a wish.

Take most care with requirements that sound neutral but affect some groups harder, such as a Dutch language level, years of experience or a driving licence for a job without driving. They need a legitimate aim and must be appropriate and necessary for it; writing the reason down shows quickly whether you have one. For language, set the level the task needs, such as following a safety briefing.

2. Put pay, hours and the real shift pattern in the advert

Put the hourly wage or range, the shift pattern and start times (including early starts) and the location in the first lines. Use plain, short words, since many applicants read Dutch or English as a second language. Describe the work rather than a type of person: drop words such as "tough", "dominant" or "young team". Say how to ask for an adjustment.

3. Let people apply on a phone, in minutes, without a CV

A CV upload favours people who own a laptop and have written a CV before, which says little about the job. Ask only what you will use at this stage: contact details, the role and the facts that decide the next step. Leave date of birth, photo and nationality out of the form; right to work is checked later, for everyone you plan to hire. The W3C accessibility guidelines help here: for example, people should not have to enter the same information twice in one process, and buttons need a minimum size (WCAG 2.2).

4. Ask every candidate the same questions, at a time they choose

Frontline candidates are often at work at 10:00, so office hour interviews quietly exclude people who already have a shift job. Let candidates choose the time, or use a format they can complete after their shift.

Ask everyone the same questions, tied to the requirements, with a short guide written in advance on what a good answer contains, and note what each candidate said against each requirement. How to Run Structured Interviews at High Volume works through this step by step. Keep questions on the job: "This role starts at 05:30 on weekdays. Can you work that pattern?" Leave children, religion, family plans and health out. If the job does not need Dutch, interview in a language the candidate understands well, so you hear their experience rather than their vocabulary.

5. Offer adjustments before anyone has to ask twice

Ask every candidate early: is there anything we can change so you can take part? Common examples are more time, a written instead of a spoken format, a different time of day, or a person instead of a form. None of these needs a diagnosis. Record the adjustment given, not the condition behind it.

6. Run the same checks for everyone you plan to hire

Checks become uneven easily: an extra document request for one candidate, a check after the offer for another. Decide which checks the role needs, such as identity, right to work and required certificates, and run them for every candidate you intend to hire, at the same stage. The identity check is a legal duty for every new worker anyway: Dutch employers must establish identity with a valid identity document and keep a copy in the payroll records, and check residence or work permit status where it applies (Wet op de loonbelasting 1964, article 28).

7. Let a person decide, and tell every candidate the outcome

A named recruiter or hiring manager should decide against the requirements and record the reason in those terms: "did not hold the required certificate" rather than "not a good fit". Tell every candidate the outcome. If any step is automated, keep a person in the decision; our blog The Tool Should Never Be the One Saying No explains why.

8. Review where people drop out, every month

Look at how many applicants reach each stage and where they leave. A sharp drop at one step, such as after the interview invitation, often points to a practical barrier you can fix. Comparing outcomes between groups can involve special categories of personal data, so take legal advice first; How to Measure Quality of Hire in Frontline Recruitment covers fairness measures.

See it on a real role: the AI Interviewer gives every applicant the same short, structured voice interview on their phone, whenever it suits them.

What changes for staffing agencies?

Agencies run one process for many clients, so the risk is drift between them.

  • Write each client's requirements into the order with a reason for each, and question unnecessary ones at intake.
  • If a client asks for something unrelated to the job, or based on a protected ground, do not pass it on. Record the request and discuss it with the client.
  • Use one question set per role across branches, so a candidate's chance does not depend on which office they walked into.

Where does AI help inclusive hiring, and where can it hurt?

It can give every applicant the same structure, and it can also repeat the bias in what it is given.

Used well, AI can hold a first interview at any hour, ask every applicant the same questions and record answers against the requirements, so a recruiter can see what a decision rests on.

A requirement that should not be there is applied to everyone just as consistently. Ask any voice tool provider how it handles different accents and what they tested, and offer another format to candidates who need one. Never use tools that read emotions from a face or voice (see the table above). No hiring tool removes bias, including ours. Keep a person in every decision, tell candidates when they are talking to an automated interviewer, and check the outcomes.

What does this look like for one warehouse role?

Illustrative example: one order picker role, before and after the checklist.

StepBeforeAfter
RequirementFluent DutchUnderstands the site safety briefing, given in Dutch and English
RequirementOwn carCan reach the site for a 06:00 start; the advert mentions the shuttle bus
Advert"Dynamic team, competitive salary"Hourly wage under the collective agreement, shifts 06:00 to 14:30 and 14:00 to 22:30, address and travel options
InterviewPhone screen between 09:00 and 17:00The same five questions for everyone, at a time the candidate picks
ChecksIdentity copied on the first dayIdentity, right to work and the required certificate checked for every candidate before the offer
Decision"Not a good fit""Did not confirm availability for the early shift"

All details are invented to show the method.

What are the limits of a process checklist?

A better process can make unfair outcomes less likely, but it cannot rule them out.

A requirement applied consistently can still affect one group harder without good reason, and most of the research cited here comes from outside the Netherlands. Checking outcomes by group is the real test, and it needs legal advice first.

How Radius helps

Radius Hire is the AI hiring platform for frontline roles. It is built to put several of these practices into the daily process:

  • Every applicant gets the same structured voice interview, in the language set for the role. Candidates are told at the start that the interviewer is automated and that a person reviews the result (AI Interviewer).
  • For each requirement, Radius shows whether it is backed by a document or a check, rests only on what the candidate said, or is still missing, with the moment in the interview that answered it (Match).
  • Where the employer uses Radius Passport, identity and right to work are checked with a trusted verification partner and certificates are recorded with their expiry dates, so a recruiter can review the evidence before an offer. It does not replace the employer's own legal duty to check identity (Radius Passport).
  • Radius never rejects a candidate on its own. A recruiter reviews the evidence, can overrule anything Radius presents and makes every hiring decision. Candidate data is hosted in the EU (Trust).

Radius does not remove bias, and it is new, so this article explains how the product works rather than claiming results.

Frequently asked questions

Do inclusive hiring practices lower the bar for frontline roles?

No. They make requirements sharper and test them the same way for everyone, and structured interviews are among the best predictors of job performance (Sackett and colleagues, 2022).

Can we ask frontline candidates about their health?

No. In the Netherlands only an examining doctor may ask about health or past sickness absence, and only for roles with special medical requirements. Describe the physical demands instead and ask whether the candidate can meet them, with or without an adjustment.

Is it allowed to require Dutch for a frontline job?

It can be, where the work needs it. Because a language requirement can affect some groups harder, it needs a legitimate aim and must be appropriate and necessary. Set and test only the level the task needs.

Do we have to publish pay in frontline job adverts?

The EU Pay Transparency Directive requires member states to give applicants a right to starting pay information, for example in the advert or before the interview. The Dutch bill that will put this into national law had not been voted on by 22 October 2026, so the rule is not yet Dutch law. Publishing pay now is good practice either way, and it helps candidates decide quickly.

What should you do first?

Start with the requirements and the interview, because everything else follows from them.

Take one role you hire for every week. Write its requirements as tasks with a reason for each, drop the ones that fail the day one test, and turn the rest into questions every candidate gets. A month later, look at where people still drop out. Inclusive hiring is a set of small, recorded choices, made the same way for everyone, with a person behind each decision.

General information, not legal advice. Position as of 22 October 2026.

Sources

  1. Thijssen, L., Coenders, M. and Lancee, B. (2021). Ethnic Discrimination in the Dutch Labor Market: Differences Between Ethnic Minority Groups and the Role of Personal Information About Job Applicants: Evidence from a Field Experiment. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 22(3), 1125 to 1150. Published online 22 December 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-020-00795-w. Accessed 22 October 2026.
  2. Sackett, P. R., Zhang, C., Berry, C. M. and Lievens, F. (2022). Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(11), 2040 to 2068. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000994. Accessed 22 October 2026.
  3. Gaucher, D., Friesen, J. and Kay, A. C. (2011). Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 109 to 128. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022530. Accessed 22 October 2026.
  4. Algemene wet gelijke behandeling (General Equal Treatment Act), articles 1, 2 and 5, version in force from 1 January 2026. https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0006502/. Accessed 22 October 2026.
  5. Wet gelijke behandeling op grond van handicap of chronische ziekte, articles 2 and 4, version in force from 1 January 2026. https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0014915/. Accessed 22 October 2026.
  6. Wet gelijke behandeling op grond van leeftijd bij de arbeid, articles 3 and 7, version in force from 1 January 2026. https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0016185/. Accessed 22 October 2026.
  7. Wet op de medische keuringen (Medical Examinations Act), article 4, version in force from 1 January 2025. https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0008819/. Accessed 22 October 2026.
  8. College voor de Rechten van de Mens. Wat gebeurt er bij het aanvragen van een oordeel bij het College? No page date shown. https://www.mensenrechten.nl/mensenrechten-voor-jou/discriminatie-en-gelijke-behandeling/discriminatieklachten-en-verzoek. Accessed 22 October 2026.
  9. College voor de Rechten van de Mens. Werving en selectie. No page date shown. https://www.mensenrechten.nl/themas/digitalisering/werving-en-selectie. Accessed 22 October 2026.
  10. Directive (EU) 2023/970 of 10 May 2023 on pay transparency and enforcement mechanisms for equal pay between men and women, OJ L 132, 17 May 2023, articles 5 and 34. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2023/970/oj. Accessed 22 October 2026.
  11. Rijksoverheid. Meer openheid over loonkloof tussen mannen en vrouwen. 21 May 2026. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/actueel/nieuws/2026/05/21/meer-openheid-over-loonkloof-tussen-mannen-en-vrouwen. Accessed 22 October 2026.
  12. Tweede Kamer. Wet implementatie Richtlijn loontransparantie mannen en vrouwen, bill 36 949. https://www.tweedekamer.nl/kamerstukken/wetsvoorstellen/detail?cfg=wetsvoorsteldetails&qry=wetsvoorstel%3A36949. Accessed 22 October 2026.
  13. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act), OJ L, 12 July 2024, article 5(1)(f) and article 113. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj. Accessed 22 October 2026.
  14. European Commission. Guidelines on prohibited artificial intelligence practices as defined by the AI Act, C(2025) 5052 final. Library page published 4 February 2025. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/commission-publishes-guidelines-prohibited-artificial-intelligence-ai-practices-defined-ai-act. Accessed 22 October 2026.
  15. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation), article 22. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj. Accessed 22 October 2026.
  16. W3C. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2, W3C Recommendation, 12 December 2024, success criteria 2.5.8 and 3.3.7. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/. Accessed 22 October 2026.
  17. Wet op de loonbelasting 1964, article 28(1)(f), version in force from 8 October 2026. https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0002471/. Accessed 22 October 2026.